Parker Meadows70
CFTigersMLB 26In real life:Parker Meadows — stats and every cardDetroit Tigers real-life rosterComerica Park
Should you buy this?
Worth the stubs for your squad
Buy low, sell higher, after tax
Hot in real life, may get upgraded
Cheapest way to feed an exchange
Where this card ranks
- 365th best of 636 center fielders
- 1,304th best of 1,945 designated hitters
Ranked the way the team builder judges a lineup spot: hitting against both hands, speed, and defense at that position.
Price history
Most expensive it's been in 29 days.
Price history
Ratings
Your ratings
How this card ranks under ratings built for specific jobs. Make one that weighs what you care about, and every card page shows where that card lands.
- Center Field RangeStaff pick#105 of 238 hitters81.1
- Five-Tool PlayerStaff pick#961 of 1,945 hitters69.1
- Leadoff SparkStaff pick#1153 of 1,945 hitters60.6
Hitting
- Contact vs L
- 57
- Contact vs R
- 55
- Power vs L
- 34
- Power vs R
- 57
- Plate vision
- 53
- Plate discipline
- 65
- Batting clutch
- 45
- Bunting
- 42
- Drag bunting
- 33
- Durability
- 86
Player
Fielding & running
- Fielding
- 90 Top 6%
- Arm strength
- 71
- Arm accuracy
- 67
- Blocking
- 0
- Speed
- 83 Top 9%
- Baserunning
- 0
- Steal
- 46
- Reaction vs L
- 77
- Reaction vs R
- 89 Top 5%
Real-world tendencies
- Spray
- All fields
Pull 40% · Center 37% · Opposite 24%
Batted balls in play, 2025 Statcast
Obtained from
Captains that boost this card
Build around one of these and this card gets their ability boost.
More Tigers at CF
Questions
- How do you get Parker Meadows?
- Buy it on the Community Market, where it costs about 43 stubs right now. It comes from: Daily Login Reward and The Show Pack.
- How much is Parker Meadows worth?
- It usually sells for about 39 stubs.
- What does Parker Meadows quicksell for?
- The game will always buy it back for 25 stubs.
- Where can I see Parker Meadows's real-life stats?
- On his player page: his career stats, awards, and every card of him in every edition.
Similar cards
Same position, comparable ratings
158% more
123% more
21% cheaper
14% cheaper
42% cheaper
84% cheaper